Home / Insights / GCC cost

What a GCC in India really costs, line by line

Kompass Technologies · Updated September 2026 · 11 min read

The short answer

A GCC in India costs roughly USD 30,000 to 45,000 per engineer per year fully loaded in a tier-one city, and USD 17,000 to 24,000 per operations role. Salary is about 70% of that; the rest is statutory benefits, workspace, IT, recruitment and compliance. One-time setup for a wholly owned subsidiary typically runs USD 120,000 to 250,000. Net savings against a US-based team usually land between 55% and 70% once everything is counted.

The run-rate, decomposed

Business cases fail internal scrutiny because they model salary and treat everything else as a rounding error. For a mid-level engineer in a tier-one Indian city, here is roughly where the money goes.

Indicative annual cost per mid-level engineer, tier-one city, 2026 planning benchmarks.
LineAnnual USDShareNotes
Base salary$22,000–30,000~62%Varies most by city and seniority
Variable pay and bonus$2,200–3,600~7%Typically 10–12% of base
Statutory benefits$2,600–3,600~8%Provident Fund, gratuity accrual, insurance
Workspace and facilities$1,800–3,000~6%Managed seats cost more per head but flex
IT, devices and software$1,500–2,400~5%Amortised laptop, licences, network, security
Recruitment, amortised$1,200–2,200~5%Rises sharply with attrition
Compliance, legal and audit$800–1,400~3%Allocated across headcount; fixed in absolute terms
Management and G&A overhead$1,400–2,600~4%Site leadership, HR, finance, admin

One-time costs most cases miss

  • Incorporation and registrations: USD 8,000 to 20,000 including legal, apostille and filing fees
  • Leadership search: USD 25,000 to 60,000 for a site leader and one or two functional heads
  • Fit-out, if you take a dedicated floor: USD 900 to 1,800 per seat, plus a security deposit of six to twelve months’ rent
  • Security and audit readiness: USD 15,000 to 50,000 depending on your certification requirements
  • Parallel running: the period where both the existing team and the new one are paid. Often the largest single one-time cost and almost always omitted
  • Travel and knowledge transfer: budget for your people to spend real time on site in the first two quarters. Skipping this is a false economy

How attrition changes the arithmetic

Attrition is not an HR metric; it is a cost line. At 20% annual attrition on a 100-person centre, you are replacing 20 people a year. Each replacement carries a recruitment cost, a ramp period during which productivity is partial, and a knowledge loss that is real but hard to price.

Practically: a city with 22% attrition and 8% lower salaries can be more expensive than a city with 13% attrition at the higher rate, once you account for productive capacity rather than headcount. This is the single strongest argument for choosing a city on talent stability rather than salary level, and it is why Chennai and Pune often beat their cost ranking.

What the savings actually look like

Against a US baseline, a fully loaded India engineer at USD 38,000 compares with roughly USD 160,000 to 180,000 for an equivalent profile — a gross gap around 77%. Net of the governance overhead, travel, parallel running and the productivity discount during ramp, most programmes realise 55% to 70% in the first two years, improving as the centre matures.

Against a UK or Western European baseline, expect 50% to 65%. Against Australia, similar. Model it honestly. A business case promising 80% savings sets up a conversation in year two that nobody enjoys.

Where cost goes wrong

  1. Seniority drift. You budgeted for mid-level engineers and hired senior ones because the mid-level market was competitive. This is the most common overrun.
  2. Real estate committed too early. A nine-year lease signed at month two for a headcount you reach at month thirty.
  3. Compliance treated as variable. It is largely fixed, which means it is punishing at 20 people and negligible at 200.
  4. Counter-offers. Budget for a 10% to 15% premium on offers in hot skill areas or accept a longer time-to-fill.
  5. Unmodelled leadership layer. A 100-person centre needs a site leader, an HR lead, a finance lead and engineering managers. That layer costs real money.

Frequently asked

Model your own numbers Get a costed plan